Prophylactic nimodipine treatment improves hearing outcome after vestibular schwannoma surgery in men: a subgroup analysis of a randomized multicenter phase III trial.

A 2016 published randomized multicenter phase III trial of prophylactic nimodipine treatment in vestibular schwannoma surgery showed only a tendency for higher hearing preservation rates in the treatment group. Gender was not included in statistical analysis at that time. A retrospective analysis of the trial considering gender, preoperative hearing, and nimodipine treatment was performed. The treatment group received parenteral nimodipine from the day before surgery until the seventh postoperative day. The control group was not treated prophylactically. Cochlear nerve function was determined by pure-tone audiometry with speech discrimination preoperatively, during in-patient care, and 1 year after surgery and classified according to the Gardner-Robertson grading scale (GR). Logistic regression analysis showed a statistically significant effect for higher hearing preservation rates (pre- and postoperative GR 1-4) in 40 men comparing the treatment (n = 21) and the control (n = 19) groups (p = 0.028), but not in 54 women comparing 27 women in both groups (p = 0.077). The results were also statistically significant for preservation of postoperative hearing with pre- and postoperative GR 1-3 (p = 0.024). There were no differences in tumor sizes between the treatment and the control groups in men, whereas statistically significant larger tumors were observed in the female treatment group compared with the female control group. Prophylactic nimodipine is safe, and an effect for hearing preservation in 40 men with preoperative hearing ability of GR 1-4 was shown in this retrospective investigation. The imbalance in tumor size with larger tumors in females of the treatment group may falsely suggest a gender-related effect. Further investigations are recommended to clarify whether gender has impact on nimodipine's efficacy.

Prophylactic nimodipine treatment and improvement in hearing outcome after vestibular schwannoma surgery: a combined analysis of a randomized, multicenter, Phase III trial and its pilot study.

OBJECTIVE In clinical routines, neuroprotective strategies in neurosurgical interventions are still missing. A pilot study (n = 30) and an analogously performed Phase III trial (n = 112) pointed to a beneficial effect of prophylactic nimodipine and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) in vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery. Considering the small sample size, the data from both studies were pooled. METHODS The patients in both investigator-initiated studies were assigned to 2 groups. The treatment group (n = 70) received parenteral nimodipine (1-2 mg/hour) and HES (hematocrit 30%-35%) from the day before surgery until the 7th postoperative day. The control group (n = 72) was not treated prophylactically. Facial and cochlear nerve functions were documented preoperatively, during the inpatient care, and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS Pooled raw data were analyzed retrospectively. Intent-to-treat analysis revealed a significantly lower risk for hearing loss (Class D) 12 months after surgery in the treatment group compared with the control group (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22-0.97; p = 0.04). After exclusion of patients with preoperative Class D hearing, this effect was more pronounced (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.17-0.83; p = 0.016). Logistic regression analysis adjusted for tumor size showed a 4 times lower risk for hearing loss in the treatment group compared with the control group (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.09-0.63; p = 0.003). Facial nerve function was not significantly improved with treatment. Apart from dose-dependent hypotension (p < 0.001), the study medication was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic nimodipine is safe and may be recommended in VS surgery to preserve hearing. Prophylactic neuroprotective treatment in surgeries in which nerves are at risk seems to be a novel and promising concept. Clinical trial registration no.: DRKS 00000328 ( https://drks-neu.uniklinik-freiburg.de/drks_web/ ).

Prophylactic nimodipine treatment for cochlear and facial nerve preservation after vestibular schwannoma surgery: a randomized multicenter Phase III trial.

OBJECTIVE: A pilot study of prophylactic nimodipine and hydroxyethyl starch treatment showed a beneficial effect on facial and cochlear nerve preservation following vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery. A prospective Phase III trial was undertaken to confirm these results. METHODS: An open-label, 2-arm, randomized parallel group and multicenter Phase III trial with blinded expert review was performed and included 112 patients who underwent VS surgery between January 2010 and February 2013 at 7 departments of neurosurgery to investigate the efficacy and safety of the prophylaxis. The surgery was performed after the patients were randomly assigned to one of 2 groups using online randomization. The treatment group (n = 56) received parenteral nimodipine (1-2 mg/hr) and hydroxyethyl starch (hematocrit 30%-35%) from the day before surgery until the 7th postoperative day. The control group (n = 56) was not treated prophylactically. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat analysis showed no statistically significant effects of the treatment on either preservation of facial nerve function (35 [67.3%] of 52 [treatment group] compared with 34 [72.3%] of 47 [control group]) (p = 0.745) or hearing preservation (11 [23.4%] of 47 [treatment group] compared with 15 [31.2%] of 48 [control group]) (p = 0.530) 12 months after surgery. Since tumor sizes were significantly larger in the treatment group than in the control group, logistic regression analysis was required. The risk for deterioration of facial nerve function was adjusted nearly the same in both groups (OR 1.07 [95% CI 0.34-3.43], p = 0.91). In contrast, the risk for postoperative hearing loss was adjusted 2 times lower in the treatment group compared with the control group (OR 0.49 [95% CI 0.18-1.30], p = 0.15). Apart from dose-dependent hypotension (p < 0.001), no clinically relevant adverse reactions were observed. CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistically significant effects of the treatment. Despite the width of the confidence intervals, the odds ratios may suggest but do not prove a clinically relevant effect of the safe study medication on the preservation of cochlear nerve function after VS surgery. Further study is needed before prophylactic nimodipine can be recommended in VS surgery.

Classification of peritumoral fiber tract alterations in gliomas using metabolic and structural neuroimaging.

UNLABELLED: The aims of this study were to investigate and categorize peritumoral fiber tract alterations while considering changes in metabolism and integrity of fiber structures using multimodal neuroimaging-that is, PET with O-(2-(18)F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine and diffusion tensor imaging evaluated by fiber density mapping-and to correlate categories of fiber alterations with preoperative neurologic deficits and postoperative course. METHODS: We examined 26 patients with cerebral gliomas. Fiber density data were used to segment peritumoral fiber structures and were coregistered to anatomic MR images and PET data. Fiber density and O-(2-(18)F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine uptake values were evaluated as ipsilateral-to-contralateral ratios. Four metabolic categories were defined on the basis of O-(2-(18)F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine values: tumor-infiltrated tissue, reactive tissue (astrogliosis and microglial activation), normal brain tissue, and tissue with attenuated amino acid metabolism. Fiber density values were grouped in 3 categories for structural integrity: compressed, normal, and attenuated fibers. RESULTS: We evaluated and classified 103 peritumoral fiber structures with 10 patterns of fiber tract alterations. Fiber structures in tumor-infiltrated, reactive, and normal brain tissue showed compressed fibers, displaced fibers, and (partly) destroyed fibers, respectively. Attenuated amino acid metabolism was associated only with attenuated fiber density. Thirteen patients showed white matter-related neurologic deficits (paresis, hypoesthesia, aphasia, or anopia) as initial symptoms. Three patients showed tumor infiltration in the corresponding fiber tracts; all the others had reactive or normal brain tissue. Fiber structures were compressed or attenuated but not normal. The 3 patients with tumor infiltration in the corresponding fiber tracts and 1 with compressed fibers in normal brain showed no improvements or worsening of the deficits in the postoperative course. Eight patients with the corresponding fiber tracts in reactive or normal brain areas showed improvement of deficits. One patient underwent biopsy only. CONCLUSION: Our multimodal neuroimaging approach provides complementary information and more detailed understanding of peritumoral fiber tract alterations in gliomas which are more complex as described so far. We presented a classification model for systematic assessment of these alterations that may be helpful for treatment planning and prediction of patients' prognoses.